The New England Journal of Medicine APRIL 07, 2016

Antenatal Betamethasone for Women at Risk for Late Preterm Delivery

Cynthia Gyamfi-Bannerman, et al. for the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units (MFMU) Network

Bottom Line

The ALPS trial demonstrated that a single course of antenatal betamethasone in women at high risk of late preterm delivery (34 0/7 to 36 6/7 weeks) significantly reduces short-term neonatal respiratory morbidity compared to placebo.

Key Findings

1. The primary outcome, a composite of neonatal respiratory support within 72 hours of birth, occurred in 11.6% of the betamethasone group compared to 14.4% in the placebo group (relative risk [RR], 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 0.97; P=0.02).
2. The number needed to treat to prevent one infant from requiring respiratory support was 35.
3. Severe neonatal respiratory morbidity was also significantly reduced in the betamethasone group (7.9%) compared to the placebo group (12.1%) (RR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.82; P<0.001).
4. Neonatal hypoglycemia (<40 mg/dL) was significantly more common in the betamethasone group (24.0%) compared to the placebo group (15.0%) (RR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.37 to 1.87; P<0.001), though the hypoglycemia was generally transient and resolved more quickly in the treatment group.

Study Design

Design
RCT
Double-Blind
Sample
2,831
Patients
Duration
72 hr
Median
Setting
Multicenter, US
Population Women with singleton pregnancies at 34 0/7 to 36 6/7 weeks of gestation who were at high risk of late preterm delivery (defined as either preterm labor or indicated preterm birth) and had not previously received antenatal corticosteroids.
Intervention Two doses of 12 mg of betamethasone administered intramuscularly 24 hours apart.
Comparator Matching placebo (saline) administered according to the same 24-hour interval protocol.
Outcome A composite of neonatal respiratory support needed within 72 hours of birth (defined as: respiratory distress syndrome, transient tachypnea of the newborn, or severe respiratory failure/support requirements).

Study Limitations

The trial excluded multiple gestations, limiting the generalizability of findings to twin or higher-order pregnancies.
The study was limited to singleton pregnancies, and the effect in multiple gestations remains a topic of extrapolation rather than direct trial evidence.
The trial used a categorical definition for hypoglycemia (<40 mg/dL) and did not standardize the timing or frequency of glucose monitoring across all clinical sites.
Although neonatal respiratory morbidity was reduced, the clinical impact of transient neonatal hypoglycemia on long-term outcomes was a necessary subject of subsequent follow-up studies.

Clinical Significance

The ALPS trial shifted obstetric clinical practice by providing evidence to support the administration of antenatal corticosteroids for late preterm pregnancies (34 0/7 to 36 6/7 weeks) at risk of imminent delivery, which is now a standard of care endorsed by ACOG to mitigate neonatal respiratory morbidity.

Historical Context

Prior to the ALPS trial, the use of antenatal corticosteroids was well-established for pregnancies at risk of preterm delivery before 34 weeks gestation. However, there was a major evidence gap for the 'late preterm' period, as neonatal survival in this period is high and the benefit-to-risk ratio of steroid exposure had not been rigorously tested in a large, randomized controlled trial until this study.

Guided Discussion

High-yield insights from every perspective

Med Student
Medical Student

What is the biochemical mechanism by which antenatal betamethasone promotes fetal lung maturity, and why is this intervention traditionally associated with gestation before 34 weeks?

Key Response

Betamethasone induces the maturation of Type II pneumocytes, increasing the production and release of surfactant which reduces alveolar surface tension. Traditionally, the focus was on deliveries before 34 weeks because surfactant production naturally increases significantly after this point, leading to the assumption that late preterm infants (34 0/7 to 36 6/7 weeks) would not benefit from exogenous corticosteroids.

Resident
Resident

A patient at 35 weeks gestation presents with preterm labor and 4cm cervical dilation. According to the ALPS trial, what is the primary neonatal benefit of administering betamethasone, and what specific neonatal metabolic complication occurred more frequently in the treatment group?

Key Response

The ALPS trial found a significant reduction in the primary composite outcome of neonatal respiratory support (CPAP or oxygen for >= 6 hours, surfactant, mechanical ventilation, etc.). However, neonatal hypoglycemia was significantly more common in the betamethasone group compared to placebo (24.0% vs. 15.0%), necessitating close glucose monitoring in these neonates.

Fellow
Fellow

The ALPS trial demonstrated a reduction in 'respiratory morbidity,' yet the majority of the benefit was driven by a reduction in Transient Tachypnea of the Newborn (TTN) and CPAP use rather than RDS or mechanical ventilation. How does this shift the risk-benefit analysis for late preterm steroids compared to early preterm steroids?

Key Response

In early preterm delivery (<34 weeks), steroids reduce high-mortality conditions like RDS, IVH, and NEC. In the late preterm period, the morbidity being prevented (like TTN) is typically transient and less severe. Therefore, the 'benefit' side of the scale is lighter, making potential long-term risks or short-term issues like hypoglycemia more influential in the clinical decision-making process.

Attending
Attending

In the ALPS trial, approximately 15% of women in the treatment group did not deliver before 37 weeks. How should the risk of 'unnecessary' steroid exposure in the late preterm period influence our clinical threshold for administration, especially given concerns regarding long-term neurodevelopmental or metabolic programming?

Key Response

The ALPS trial showed that many women identified as being 'at risk' for late preterm delivery will actually carry to term. Because the neonatal benefits are for relatively mild respiratory morbidity, clinicians should strictly adhere to the study's inclusion criteria (e.g., cervical dilation >= 3cm or ruptured membranes) to avoid over-treating the significant number of women whose 'threatened' labor does not result in imminent delivery.

Scholarly Review

Critical appraisal through the lens of expert reviewers and guideline development

PhD
PhD

The ALPS trial utilized a composite primary outcome. Analyze the methodological implications of including 'respiratory support for at least 6 hours' alongside 'surfactant use' or 'mechanical ventilation' in a population with low baseline event rates.

Key Response

Using a composite outcome increases statistical power in populations where severe events (like mechanical ventilation) are rare. However, if the treatment effect is primarily driven by the most frequent and least severe component (CPAP/oxygen for 6 hours), the 'significant' result may overstate the clinical impact on infant health. Methodologically, this requires a sensitivity analysis of the individual components to ensure the composite isn't masking a lack of effect on more clinically 'hard' endpoints.

Journal Editor
Journal Editor

If you were reviewing the ALPS trial for publication, how would you evaluate the high rate of neonatal hypoglycemia in the treatment group regarding its impact on the study's 'Net Clinical Benefit'?

Key Response

A tough reviewer would flag that while respiratory morbidity decreased, a significant iatrogenic morbidity (hypoglycemia) was introduced. The editor would look for whether the study was powered to detect the consequences of that hypoglycemia (e.g., longer NICU stays or neurodevelopmental impact) and whether the 'reduction in respiratory support' outweighs the 'increase in metabolic monitoring and potential interventions' for hypoglycemia.

Guideline Committee
Guideline Committee

ACOG and SMFM guidelines now recommend a single course of betamethasone for women at risk of delivery between 34 0/7 and 36 6/7 weeks, but with specific caveats. How do these guidelines address patients with pre-gestational diabetes, and how does this align with the ALPS study population?

Key Response

Current guidelines (ACOG Practice Bulletin 209) recommend avoiding late preterm steroids in women with pre-gestational diabetes because the ALPS trial specifically excluded women with pre-gestational diabetes. This is due to the significant risk of maternal hyperglycemia and the already elevated baseline risk of neonatal hypoglycemia in diabetic pregnancies, which betamethasone would likely exacerbate.

Clinical Landscape

Noteworthy Related Trials

1981

Collaborative Group on Antenatal Steroid Therapy

n = 530 · NEJM

Tested

Antenatal dexamethasone

Population

Women at risk of preterm delivery between 28-34 weeks gestation

Comparator

Placebo

Endpoint

Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome and mortality

Key result: Antenatal administration of corticosteroids significantly reduced the incidence of respiratory distress syndrome and neonatal mortality in preterm infants.
2007

ACTORDS Trial

n = 535 · BMJ

Tested

Repeat dose of antenatal corticosteroids

Population

Women at risk of preterm birth who received an initial course more than 7 days prior

Comparator

Placebo

Endpoint

Composite of serious neonatal morbidity

Key result: A repeat dose of corticosteroids reduced the risk of respiratory distress and other serious morbidities without increasing adverse outcomes.
2017

Follow-up Study of the ALPS Trial

n = 2,831 · JAMA

Tested

Antenatal betamethasone

Population

Children exposed to betamethasone in late preterm period

Comparator

Placebo

Endpoint

Social-emotional and neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years of age

Key result: There were no significant differences in neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years of age between children exposed to antenatal betamethasone and those in the placebo group.

Tailored to your role

Want this tailored to you?

Add your specialty or training stage to get role-specific takeaways and more questions.

Personalize this analysis