The New England Journal of Medicine JULY 04, 2013

Clopidogrel with Aspirin in Acute Minor Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack (CHANCE)

Yongjun Wang, Yilong Wang, Xingquan Zhao, Liping Liu, David Y. Wang, et al. for the CHANCE Investigators

Bottom Line

In patients with high-risk transient ischemic attack or minor ischemic stroke, the administration of dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin for 21 days significantly reduced the risk of subsequent stroke within 90 days without increasing the risk of hemorrhage compared to aspirin monotherapy.

Key Findings

1. Dual antiplatelet therapy (clopidogrel and aspirin) reduced the 90-day risk of subsequent stroke to 8.2% compared to 11.7% with aspirin alone (hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.57–0.81; P<0.001).
2. There was no statistically significant difference in the risk of moderate or severe hemorrhage between the treatment arms (0.3% in both groups; P=0.73).
3. The absolute risk reduction for stroke was 3.5%, corresponding to a number needed to treat (NNT) of approximately 29 to prevent one stroke event within 90 days.
4. Long-term follow-up at 1 year confirmed the persistence of the benefit, with a stroke rate of 10.6% in the combination group versus 14.0% in the aspirin-only group (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.65–0.93; P=0.006).

Study Design

Design
RCT
Double-Blind
Sample
5,170
Patients
Duration
90 days (primary), 1 yr (secondary)
Median
Setting
Multicenter, China
Population Patients aged 40 or older with acute minor ischemic stroke (NIHSS ≤ 3) or high-risk TIA (ABCD2 score ≥ 4) presenting within 24 hours of symptom onset.
Intervention Clopidogrel (300 mg loading dose, followed by 75 mg/day for 90 days) plus aspirin (75 mg/day for 21 days).
Comparator Placebo plus aspirin (75 mg/day for 90 days).
Outcome Any stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) within 90 days.

Study Limitations

The study population was restricted to patients in China, which limits the generalizability of results to more diverse populations with different genetic backgrounds affecting clopidogrel metabolism (e.g., CYP2C19 polymorphisms).
Potential variations in local secondary prevention practices and standards of care in China compared to Western healthcare systems may have influenced observed outcomes.
The trial focused on a specific short-term regimen (21 days of dual therapy) and did not address the optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy beyond this period.

Clinical Significance

The CHANCE trial provided critical evidence supporting the use of short-term dual antiplatelet therapy immediately following high-risk TIA or minor ischemic stroke, shifting clinical practice toward more aggressive early intervention to address the period of highest recurrence risk, while maintaining a favorable safety profile regarding bleeding.

Historical Context

Prior trials, such as MATCH and CHARISMA, evaluated long-term dual antiplatelet therapy in stroke patients and found no significant benefit but increased bleeding risks. CHANCE was designed to test whether initiating therapy in the acute, hyper-early phase (within 24 hours) with a limited 21-day course of dual agents could circumvent these risks and capitalize on the high early recurrence rate of ischemic events.

Guided Discussion

High-yield insights from every perspective

Med Student
Medical Student

What is the biological rationale for using dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with clopidogrel and aspirin rather than aspirin alone in the immediate aftermath of a minor ischemic stroke?

Key Response

Aspirin inhibits thromboxane A2 production via the COX-1 pathway, while clopidogrel blocks the P2Y12 adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor. Because these drugs target distinct and complementary pathways of platelet activation and aggregation, their combination provides a synergistic effect that is more effective at preventing thrombus propagation during the 'hyperacute' period when the risk of recurrence is highest.

Resident
Resident

Based on the CHANCE trial inclusion criteria, which specific patient population with Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) should be considered for 21 days of DAPT, and what scoring system is used to identify them?

Key Response

The CHANCE trial specifically targeted 'high-risk' TIA patients, defined as those with an ABCD2 score of 4 or higher. This score accounts for Age, Blood pressure, Clinical features, Duration of symptoms, and Diabetes. Identifying this high-risk cohort is essential because the benefit of DAPT in preventing early recurrence outweighs the potential bleeding risks specifically in this group, whereas low-risk TIA patients may not derive the same net benefit.

Fellow
Fellow

Contrast the DAPT duration and loading dose strategies used in the CHANCE trial versus the later POINT trial. How do these differences influence the risk-benefit profile regarding major hemorrhage?

Key Response

CHANCE used a 300mg clopidogrel load and 21 days of DAPT, while POINT used a 600mg load and 90 days of DAPT. While both showed a reduction in ischemic events, POINT found a significantly higher risk of major hemorrhage that emerged primarily after the first 3 weeks of therapy. This suggests that the maximal benefit for stroke prevention is front-loaded in the first 21 days, after which the risk of bleeding may outweigh the preventative benefit.

Attending
Attending

The CHANCE trial emphasized initiating treatment within 24 hours of symptom onset. How has this specific time window changed the clinical approach to 'minor' symptoms in the emergency department, and what are the implications for patients who present at 48 hours?

Key Response

The trial solidified the concept that minor stroke and TIA are medical emergencies requiring 'ultra-early' intervention. The efficacy of the CHANCE protocol is tied to starting within 24 hours; for patients presenting later, the evidence for DAPT benefit is less robust because the highest risk of recurrence has already passed, highlighting the need for rapid triage and treatment systems equivalent to those used for major strokes.

Scholarly Review

Critical appraisal through the lens of expert reviewers and guideline development

PhD
PhD

Given that the CHANCE trial was conducted entirely in China, how do population-specific frequencies of CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles potentially limit the external validity of these findings to a broader global population?

Key Response

CYP2C19 loss-of-function (LOF) alleles, which reduce the conversion of clopidogrel to its active metabolite, are present in approximately 50% of East Asian populations compared to about 25-30% of White populations. If clopidogrel is less effective in LOF carriers, the 'true' efficacy of the DAPT regimen might actually be higher in Western populations, or conversely, different genetic predispositions toward bleeding could alter the safety profile, necessitating localized validation.

Journal Editor
Journal Editor

As a reviewer, what are the potential threats to internal validity regarding the 'minor stroke' definition used in CHANCE (NIHSS ≤ 3), particularly concerning the lack of mandatory baseline MRI imaging for all participants?

Key Response

An NIHSS of 3 can represent very different clinical states (e.g., isolated aphasia vs. multiple minor motor deficits). Without mandatory MRI, it is impossible to distinguish between a TIA and a small tissue-positive infarct in all cases. This heterogeneity means the treatment effect might be driven by a specific subgroup (e.g., large-artery atherosclerosis) that remained hidden due to the lack of standardized neuroimaging, complicating the precision of the trial's conclusions.

Guideline Committee
Guideline Committee

How do the results of the CHANCE trial align with current AHA/ASA guidelines regarding the duration of DAPT for secondary stroke prevention, and what is the current Class and Level of recommendation for this intervention?

Key Response

Current AHA/ASA guidelines (e.g., 2021/2022 updates) recommend that patients with minor ischemic stroke (NIHSS ≤ 3) or high-risk TIA (ABCD2 ≥ 4) should receive DAPT started within 24 hours and continued for 21 to 90 days, followed by antiplatelet monotherapy. This is a Class I, Level of Evidence A recommendation, directly supported by the CHANCE and POINT trials which demonstrated that early, short-term DAPT significantly reduces 90-day stroke recurrence.

Clinical Landscape

Noteworthy Related Trials

2004

MATCH Trial

n = 7,599 · Lancet

Tested

Clopidogrel plus aspirin

Population

High-risk patients with recent ischemic stroke or TIA

Comparator

Clopidogrel alone

Endpoint

Composite of ischemic stroke, MI, vascular death, or rehospitalization

Key result: The addition of aspirin to clopidogrel did not provide significant benefit over clopidogrel alone but significantly increased bleeding risk.
2012

SPS3 Trial

n = 3,020 · NEJM

Tested

Clopidogrel plus aspirin

Population

Patients with symptomatic lacunar stroke

Comparator

Aspirin alone

Endpoint

Recurrent stroke

Key result: Dual antiplatelet therapy did not reduce the rate of recurrent stroke but doubled the risk of major hemorrhage compared to aspirin alone.
2018

POINT Trial

n = 4,881 · NEJM

Tested

Clopidogrel plus aspirin

Population

Patients with minor ischemic stroke or high-risk TIA

Comparator

Aspirin alone

Endpoint

Composite of major ischemic events (ischemic stroke, MI, or death)

Key result: Clopidogrel plus aspirin was superior to aspirin alone in reducing major ischemic events but increased the risk of major hemorrhage.

Tailored to your role

Want this tailored to you?

Add your specialty or training stage to get role-specific takeaways and more questions.

Personalize this analysis