The New England Journal of Medicine August 26, 2023

Ferric Carboxymaltose in Heart Failure with Iron Deficiency (HEART-FID)

Mentz RJ, Garg J, Rockhold FW, et al.

Bottom Line

In ambulatory patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and iron deficiency, treatment with intravenous ferric carboxymaltose did not significantly improve a hierarchical composite outcome of death, heart failure hospitalization, or 6-minute walk distance compared to placebo.

Key Findings

1. The primary hierarchical composite outcome (death, heart failure hospitalization, and 6-minute walk distance) showed no statistically significant difference between the ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) and placebo groups (P=0.19) [1.1.7].
2. Death by 12 months occurred in 8.6% of patients in the FCM group compared to 9.2% of patients in the placebo group.
3. Hospitalization for heart failure by 12 months occurred in 14.3% of the FCM group versus 14.5% in the placebo group.
4. An increase in the 6-minute walk distance of at least 5 meters at 6 months was observed in 30.2% of the FCM group and 28.5% of the placebo group.
5. Adverse events were similar between both groups, demonstrating the safety of FCM but failing to confirm the hypothesized prognostic cardiovascular benefit in this population.

Study Design

Design
RCT
Double-Blind
Sample
3,065
Patients
Duration
12 mo
Median
Setting
Multicenter, multinational
Population Ambulatory patients with chronic heart failure, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40%, and iron deficiency (ferritin <100 ng/mL, or 100-299 ng/mL with TSAT <20%) on stable medical therapy.
Intervention Intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) administered as two 15-mg/kg or 20-mg/kg doses separated by 7 days, with maintenance dosing every 6 months if indicated.
Comparator Intravenous normal saline placebo administered on an identical schedule.
Outcome A hierarchical composite of death within 12 months, hospitalization for heart failure within 12 months, and change in 6-minute walk distance from baseline to 6 months.

Study Limitations

The 12-month follow-up period may have been too brief to detect a long-term mortality or hospitalization benefit from iron repletion [1.1.7].
Widespread use of contemporary guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT)—including SGLT2 inhibitors, which inherently modulate erythropoiesis and were popularized by the DAPA-HF and DELIVER trials—may have attenuated the marginal absolute benefit of intravenous iron.
The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted trial enrollment, protocol adherence, and background hospitalization rates, potentially confounding the event-driven outcomes.
The use of a complex unmatched hierarchical win-ratio for the primary endpoint may have diluted the sensitivity to detect improvements in individual components like functional capacity.

Clinical Significance

The HEART-FID trial serves as a crucial counterweight to earlier, smaller studies (like FAIR-HF and CONFIRM-HF) that showed robust functional benefits with intravenous iron. Its neutral findings indicate that while intravenous ferric carboxymaltose is safe and may help manage symptoms in iron-deficient HFrEF patients, it should not be relied upon as a primary mortality-reducing or disease-modifying therapy. This highlights the complexity of treating the iron deficiency-heart failure overlap syndrome in an era where modern GDMT, such as SGLT2 inhibitors, has already significantly improved baseline cardiovascular risk.

Historical Context

Iron deficiency is a highly prevalent comorbidity in heart failure, driving a dangerous overlap syndrome characterized by impaired myocardial energetics, worsened fatigue, and increased mortality independent of anemia. While earlier trials (FAIR-HF, CONFIRM-HF) demonstrated that intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) improved functional capacity and quality of life in HFrEF, its impact on hard outcomes remained contested. Furthermore, the AFFIRM-AHF trial suggested a benefit primarily in patients recently discharged for acute heart failure. Concurrently, the landscape of heart failure treatment evolved rapidly with the introduction of SGLT2 inhibitors (proven across the ejection fraction spectrum in the DAPA-HF and DELIVER trials), which intrinsically influence hematopoiesis and iron utilization. The HEART-FID trial was launched as the largest definitive study to ascertain whether FCM could deliver a prognostic mortality and hospitalization benefit on top of modern therapies in ambulatory patients. Ultimately, it failed to demonstrate a significant reduction in hard cardiovascular events, adding major nuance to current treatment guidelines.

Guided Discussion

High-yield insights from every perspective

Med Student
Medical Student

Why do patients with heart failure frequently develop iron deficiency, and how does this affect cellular metabolism independent of anemia?

Key Response

Heart failure causes a chronic inflammatory state leading to elevated hepcidin, which traps iron in macrophages and enterocytes, causing functional iron deficiency. Iron is essential not just for hemoglobin, but for the mitochondrial electron transport chain and myoglobin in skeletal and cardiac muscle, explaining fatigue and reduced exercise capacity even without overt anemia.

Resident
Resident

Given the neutral results of the HEART-FID trial, how should you approach a patient with HFrEF on guideline-directed medical therapy who complains of severe fatigue and is found to have a ferritin of 80 ng per mL with a TSAT of 15 percent? Should IV iron still be prescribed?

Key Response

While HEART-FID was neutral on its primary hierarchical outcome, previous trials like AFFIRM-AHF and CONFIRM-HF showed improvements in symptoms and reductions in hospitalizations. The resident must weigh the neutral HEART-FID results against existing class 2a guideline recommendations for symptom relief, recognizing that IV iron is still often used to improve quality of life and functional status.

Fellow
Fellow

The HEART-FID trial used a hierarchical composite primary endpoint analyzed using the Finkelstein-Schoenfeld method. How does this statistical approach differ from a traditional time-to-first-event analysis, and why might it have been chosen for this specific heart failure trial?

Key Response

The Finkelstein-Schoenfeld method compares every patient in the treatment arm to every patient in the placebo arm sequentially based on clinical priority: death, then heart failure hospitalizations, then 6-minute walk distance. It prevents non-fatal events from overshadowing mortality, which is crucial in heart failure trials where quality of life and mortality can sometimes move in different directions or have disproportionate event rates.

Attending
Attending

How do we reconcile the neutral findings of HEART-FID with the positive results of previous IV iron trials in heart failure, and how does this discrepancy alter the shared decision-making conversation with our patients regarding the anticipated benefits of ferric carboxymaltose?

Key Response

HEART-FID enrolled a more stable, ambulatory population compared to AFFIRM-AHF and had a lower overall event rate. Attendings must teach that while IV iron may not definitively prolong life or prevent hospitalizations in highly stable outpatients on excellent contemporary medical therapy, it remains a valuable tool for symptom palliation, shifting the conversation from preventing death to potentially improving daily function.

Scholarly Review

Critical appraisal through the lens of expert reviewers and guideline development

PhD
PhD

The HEART-FID trial was conducted partially during the COVID-19 pandemic, which impacted both event rates and in-person assessments. What are the methodological implications of lower-than-expected event rates on the statistical power of a hierarchical analysis like the win ratio or Finkelstein-Schoenfeld approach?

Key Response

Lower event rates severely reduce the power of the top tiers of the hierarchy, such as death and hospitalizations. This forces the statistical weight onto the lowest tier, such as 6-minute walk distance, which is notoriously variable and subject to missing data during a pandemic. A rigorous critique would focus on whether the trial was truly negative or simply underpowered due to compromised event-driven assumptions.

Journal Editor
Journal Editor

As a reviewer, how would you evaluate the impact of missing 6-minute walk distance data, especially given that it constituted the final tie-breaking tier of the hierarchical composite outcome in this trial?

Key Response

Missing data in the lowest tier of a hierarchical composite can introduce significant bias, particularly if missingness is informative, for example if sicker patients could not attend in-person visits. A critical editor would scrutinize the imputation methods used for missing walk tests and demand rigorous sensitivity analyses, as the failure to detect a difference could be an artifact of data dilution in this crucial tier.

Guideline Committee
Guideline Committee

Current ACC and AHA guidelines provide a Class 2a recommendation for IV iron in HFrEF with iron deficiency to improve symptoms and reduce hospitalizations. Should the neutral results of HEART-FID downgrade this recommendation, or does the totality of evidence support maintaining it?

Key Response

Despite HEART-FID missing its primary endpoint, meta-analyses incorporating it alongside AFFIRM-AHF, CONFIRM-HF, and IRONMAN still suggest a modest reduction in heart failure hospitalizations and symptom improvement. The committee must deliberate whether a single large neutral trial in a stable population overrides previous positive trials in sicker populations. The recommendation likely remains 2a for symptom improvement but with tempered expectations regarding hard clinical outcomes.

Clinical Landscape

Noteworthy Related Trials

2009

FAIR-HF Trial

n = 459 · NEJM

Tested

Intravenous Ferric Carboxymaltose

Population

HFrEF patients with iron deficiency

Comparator

Placebo

Endpoint

Self-reported Patient Global Assessment and NYHA functional class at 24 weeks

Key result: Treatment with intravenous iron significantly improved symptoms, functional capacity, and quality of life compared to placebo.
2014

CONFIRM-HF Trial

n = 304 · Eur Heart J

Tested

Intravenous Ferric Carboxymaltose for 52 weeks

Population

Symptomatic HFrEF patients with iron deficiency

Comparator

Placebo

Endpoint

Change in 6-minute walk test distance at week 24

Key result: Long-term FCM treatment safely improved functional capacity, symptoms, and quality of life, and reduced the risk of hospitalization for worsening heart failure.
2020

AFFIRM-AHF Trial

n = 1,108 · Lancet

Tested

Intravenous Ferric Carboxymaltose prior to discharge

Population

Patients stabilized after an acute heart failure episode with iron deficiency

Comparator

Placebo

Endpoint

Composite of total heart failure hospitalizations and cardiovascular death at 52 weeks

Key result: FCM administration reduced the risk of heart failure hospitalizations but did not significantly reduce cardiovascular death compared to placebo.

Tailored to your role

Want this tailored to you?

Add your specialty or training stage to get role-specific takeaways and more questions.

Personalize this analysis